Methodological challenges when performing a systematic review.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Well-conducted systematic reviews can provide a foundation upon which to base educational curricula, practice guidelines and healthcare policy. We aim to provide an overview of important methodological issues that need to be addressed during the five phases of performing a systematic review. 1. The specific problems to be addressed by the systematic review need to be formulated as clear, unambiguous and structured question/s. 2. Literature from multiple resources should be searched to avoid publication biases, as positive outcomes are more likely to be published than null/negative results. 3. The quality of selected articles should be assessed using a checklist, while the reliability of graders, as well as the quality of the checklist, needs to be established a priori. 4. Statistical heterogeneity needs to be assessed to determine if a meta-analysis is appropriate to pool the data. If not, a narrative synthesis of the evidence/overall findings needs to be performed within a clinical context.
منابع مشابه
Nursing Inter Professional Communication Challenges: A systematic Review
Introduction: Communication is an essential issue in performing care and treatment measures of nursing. There are extensive inter-professional communication colleagues in the nursing profession, patients and families, and other professions, which is necessary to do teamwork, and maintaining this relationship of nursing is essential. Being aware of the challenges of inter-professional communica...
متن کاملCollaboration challenges in systematic reviews: a survey of health sciences librarians
OBJECTIVE While many librarians have been asked to participate in systematic reviews with researchers, often these researchers are not familiar with the systematic review process or the appropriate role for librarians. The purpose of this study was to identify the challenges and barriers that librarians face when collaborating on systematic reviews. To take a wider view of the whole process of ...
متن کاملEffect of Medicinal Herbs on Primary Dysmenorrhoea- a Systematic Review
Conventional treatment for primary dysmenorrhoea has a failure rate of 20% to 25% and may be contraindicated or not tolerated by some women. Herbal medicine may be a suitable alternative. The objective of the manuscript, is determine the efficacy and safety of some Iranian herbal medicine for primary dysmenorrhea when compared with placebo, no treatment, and other treatment. For this target ele...
متن کاملCritical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews are pivotal components in the development of evidence-based clinical guidelines. To evaluate the methodological quality of these systematic reviews, several tools have been proposed. Among them, the assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) checklist is probably used most frequently. This tool comprises 11 items related to the steps taken when conducting a...
متن کاملEffect of Medicinal Herbs on Primary Dysmenorrhoea- a Systematic Review
Conventional treatment for primary dysmenorrhoea has a failure rate of 20% to 25% and may be contraindicated or not tolerated by some women. Herbal medicine may be a suitable alternative. The objective of the manuscript, is determine the efficacy and safety of some Iranian herbal medicine for primary dysmenorrhea when compared with placebo, no treatment, and other treatment. For this target ele...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- European journal of orthodontics
دوره 37 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015